Wednesday, June 26, 2013

BLOG 48. Gray Beards

Cliff Jacobson

A few years ago, I presented a program for the Minnesota Canoe Association. About 150 people attended.  With the exception of six teenage girls—who were there to show slides of their trip in the Boundary Waters—everyone (including me) had gray hair.  Murmurs of “look at all the gray beards” bounced around the room.

Gray is now largely the hair color of those who enjoy the Boundary Waters Canoe Area each summer. When, in 1968, at the age of 28, I made my first trip into this region, most of the paddlers were not much older than me.  Now, the average age is close to fifty. Where have all the young people gone?
Where have all the young people gone?  Cr. Mike Rapatz
To technology, mostly. Today’s kids would rather play on their computer than go outside. Few have ever gone canoeing, fewer still have camped out-of-sight of an RV. They have no use for wilderness. Richard Louve, addresses this concern in his book, Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature Deficit Disorder. Louv makes the case that kids are so consumed by TV and video games that they have lost their connection to the natural world—they see no value in wild places and therefore, no reason to preserve them. I taught eighth grade environmental science for 30 years and I can say he is right on target.
Cr. Mike Rapatz
What isn’t, is society’s view that kids must be flooded with (mostly useless) information and tested frequently to ascertain their knowledge of it. The result is that teachers have no time for social or environmental concerns. They must teach to tests that are designed by those who don’t hike, camp or canoe or give a wit about wilderness. Teachers who do take their students outdoors without meeting the “approved government objective”, are asking for trouble. If it’s not in the state-approved curriculum—or more accurately, “not on the test”—it’s not acceptable. Even nature centers are not immune from regulation. Where once, they could present a variety of interesting topics, they, like teachers, must now key into the “approved curriculum”.
Cr. Zoe Kesselring
Field trips?  What are they?  Or rather, what were they? Schools no longer have money for away-from-school activities. Field trips now are largely self-funded, meaning the kids—not the school--pays for the bus ride. Admittedly, a few (very few) teachers defy the odds and meticulously collect bus fare—usually two to five dollars per head.  Some kids pay, some don’t.  Caring administrators often look the other way. Ultimately, teachers tire of the extra work and the field trips just go away.

Then, there's the matter of party size in the BWCA. In the 1970's, when I began to take kids "up north", the party size was 10 and there was no limit on the number of canoes in the group. Our groups were all co-ed, nine kids and one teacher.  Now, two adult leaders are required for every teen group, and the maximum party size is nine.  This translates into seven paying teens, not nine as in the past. And with two leaders, expenses double.  No wonder school groups are largely a thing of the past.  Nine people and four canoes are the rule in the Boundary Waters, which means someone has to ride "dead weight"--hardly a good time for a teenager who wants to paddle. Frankly, I think that this rule should be re-visited. 

There's also the matter of "fun", or possibly the lack of it.  Get a group of kids together and they'll naturally make noise--singing, dancing on logs and yelling at their friends are part of the growing up game. And so is congregating with their friends. Yes, kids must learn to respect the quiet and sanctity of the wilderness, and it's our job to teach them.  Still, when they do forget the rules, we--and those around them--need to be compassionate.    

When I taught environmental science at Hastings Middle School (I retired in 2001), I offered free after school canoe trips on the nearby Mississippi River. We went twice a week when the weather was good, and always had a full house.  But now, with today’s ludicrous demands on teachers, I’d have no time for it.
Cr. Robyn Keyport
When snow covered the ground I took each of my classes on a half-day snowshoe hike.  The kids would ask: “Mr. J, what do we have to write down?”

            “But what do we have to know for the test?”
            “Won’t be on a test!”
            “Yeah, great, but then, why we goin’?”
            “Just for fun and to learn to love wild places.  Is that okay?”
            “Yeah, man, way cool!”

Get the point?  Too bad our politicians don’t. 

The result is that we’re raising a generation of youngsters who love malls more than trees.  And unless we change our educational expectations, and quickly, I fear that we will continue to lose more wilderness and more of our sanity.


1 comment:

Anonymous said...

unfortunately this is a sad reality. I was lucky enough to have a scout leader and outdoorsman for a father and spent many hours on the water and in the woods, and now pass on the skills to other kids.
In my twenty years in scouting I have been amazed at the poor attitudes and knowledge these kids are learning from school, and the amount of work required to teach them self reliance and self respect- take away their computers and I-phones and they can't do the simplest tasks.
There is increasingly the same problem in scouting and other youth groups, we call it the "glass wall" we can teach them the skills and knowledge, but it's increasingly harder to allow them to practice and fail occasionally because of "liability" and the possibility of "emotional damage" Map reading is my pet peeve; it's nothing more than basic geometry, but without their computer or calculator it is almost impossible for the youth to comprehend!
In my opinion if a youth tries and fails, then tries again and succeeds, he learns TWO lessons, one is that crap happens, and the other is that they CAN overcome obstacles and meet their objective. These are life skills they are learning, while also becoming more aware of the world around them and how they interact with it.